Cite RRR no. 3249
Each form already names the RRR number and the entry’s original source details, as the project’s house style asks. The access date updates itself.
MLA 9
RRR no. 3249 (1258). The Crusades Regesta, www.crusades-regesta.com/3249. Accessed 21 Sep. 2026. Original source: Delaville Le Roulx, Les Archives, pp. 181-84, no. 79; RRH 1201. Wrongly dated 1252 in the printed edition – Thomas Berard was not yet master. Jean Richard, ‘Le comté de Tripoli dans les chartes du fonds des Porcellet’, p. 354 n.3 proposes 1258 or 1259 as the correct date..
MHRA
The Crusades Regesta, RRR no. 3249 (1258) <https://www.crusades-regesta.com/3249> [accessed 21 September 2026]; original source: Delaville Le Roulx, Les Archives, pp. 181-84, no. 79; RRH 1201. Wrongly dated 1252 in the printed edition – Thomas Berard was not yet master. Jean Richard, ‘Le comté de Tripoli dans les chartes du fonds des Porcellet’, p. 354 n.3 proposes 1258 or 1259 as the correct date..
Harvard
The Crusades Regesta (2026) RRR no. 3249 (1258). Available at: https://www.crusades-regesta.com/3249 (Accessed: 21 September 2026). Original source: Delaville Le Roulx, Les Archives, pp. 181-84, no. 79; RRH 1201. Wrongly dated 1252 in the printed edition – Thomas Berard was not yet master. Jean Richard, ‘Le comté de Tripoli dans les chartes du fonds des Porcellet’, p. 354 n.3 proposes 1258 or 1259 as the correct date..
Suggest a correction to RRR no. 3249
This goes to the editors as a suggestion, with the entry already identified. It is not published, and the entry is not changed until someone has read it. If you would rather be credited or asked a follow-up question, leave your name and email.
